In our industry, a premium is often placed -- or misplaced -- on measuring outputs (something delivered or completed) over outcomes (benefits or consequences of an output). Outputs are things counted as finished (in a specific moment in time), whereas outcomes are a measure of value delivered (over time to many different people). This lively, interactive, fun session will involve small group activities. After a discussion of what constitutes an outcome and an output, and why the difference matters, we will break into small groups and draft meaningful, outcome-based measures of impact. Each group will write its own outcome statements for specific scenarios, with help from our talented facilitators, and will then share these with the full room. Participants will learn why outcomes matter more than outputs by engaging in collaborative discussion with other attendees. They will leave ready to think more about outcomes when creating goals for individuals, teams, or organizations.

Digital accessibility is mission-critical for scholarly publishing. While publishers have made progress with born-accessible workflows, many still struggle with adding alternative text (alt text) for images--a fundamental requirement of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) for over 20 years. We continue to add undescribed images to digital publications and online libraries, widening the visual gap for blind and visually impaired people and for search engines that cannot "see" images. Missing alt text is also a critical fault for digital cataloging, creating a massive database of disorganized, visually inaccessible content. How do we operationalize this in a sustainable way? With a growing number of vendor solutions, what should publishers outsource, and what should they develop in-house? What is reasonable to expect from authors, and what should be handled by publishers? What is needed to integrate authoritative, descriptive metadata into content production lifecycles so that visual media are fully contextualized and explained to visually impaired people? || Learning Level: Mixed-Learning || Speakers: Caroline Desrosiers; Hannah Heckner; Michelle Urberg; Lettie Conrad

As a community, we are undoubtedly moving into a more "open" future — open access, open data, open peer review, etc. But "open" doesn't automatically mean "equal." A panel of Chefs will conclude this year's meeting with a look at the path we're on — is it fair to all, and can everyone participate? Are APCs the evolutionary endpoint or a step along the way? What does the ongoing market consolidation mean for different stakeholders? Are we increasing the inequities between the Global North and South? Will the increasing intrusion of geopolitics into the research world make this all moot? Bring your questions for a lively discussion. || Speakers: Robert Harington; Lettie Conrad; Angela Cochran; David Crotty; Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe