Skip to main content

You must be logged in to view this video.

To get a login or to purchase access for an existing login:

Register

On-Demand Meetings

Real World Results on Peer Review: Pilot Study Indicates a Solution

Real World Results on Peer Review: Pilot Study Indicates a Solution
In the scholarly publishing world, peer review is essential to the quality and credibility of academic publications. However, there are challenges in finding reviewers, educating peer reviewers, and obtaining useful peer reviewer reports within a reasonable time period. 2 Publishers, 1 Editor in Chief, and 1 Submission Platform Technologist will discuss how the introduction of a structured peer review process (SPR) can decrease peer review time and increase the quality of peer review reports. Get an inside look into the development of a structured peer review program in a pilot study across twenty-three journals. Attendees will gain insights into the study results and learn the 9 structured peer review questions that yielded a 92% reviewer-response rate, so that they can reproduce in their own submission systems. After attending this session, attendees will be able to develop and evaluate a structured peer-review process in their own publications.
Publication Date
May 2025

47th Annual Meeting (2025)

48
Although every year in the scholarly publishing ecosystem is a balancing act of innovation, optimization, and value creation, 2025 is shaping up to be particularly challenging as the pace and scale of change is accelerating more than we’ve ever seen before. There is increasing pressure to provide value to and to meet the incredibly diverse needs of the global research community while maintaining financial health for our own organizations, living our values, and continuing to protect the scholarly record. With AI, open access, integrity, and mistrust frequently dominating the conversation, we are in the midst of an unprecedented shift in both our industry and society as a whole. As always, the SSP community continues to focus on bringing together academics, funders, librarians, publishers, service providers, technologists, researchers and countless others with a communal interest and stake in disseminating scholarly information. We look to the 47th Annual Meeting as an opportunity to continue this tradition and welcome all colleagues and community stakeholders.

Christopher I. Petkov

1

Professor of Neurosurgery, Vice Chair for Research, and Editor in Chief, Iowa Carver School of Medicine

Christopher I. Petkov, PhD is a Professor of Neurosurgery and Vice Chair for Research at the Iowa Carver College of Medicine, department of Neurosurgery. He has a PhD. in Systems Neuroscience from the University of California in Davis, CA. He is Editor in Chief of Current Research in Neurobiology and interested in peer review research.

Jeff Christie

1

Senior Client Services Account Coordinator ,Aries Systems

Jennifer Regala

7

Wolters Kluwer Health

In her role as Associate Director, Publishing, at Wolters Kluwer Health, Jennifer Regala works with award-winning news magazine publications, including Oncology Times and Emergency Medicine News. Jennifer has worked in scholarly publishing for 20+ years, most recently as the Director of Publications/Executive Editor at the American Urological Association. Jennifer's personal motto is: "It's free to be nice and to comb your hair.."

Virginia W. Pittman

1

Executive Publisher, Elsevier B.V.

Ginny Pittman leads a medical journal portfolio at Elsevier, with 14 open access and subscription journals. She has over 25 years of experience in scholarly research publishing and educational product development, making an impact in the healthcare and life sciences fields at Wiley, Blackwell, Wolters Kluwer, and Mary Ann Liebert Publishers. She has presented to author communities at medical institutions globally and has created new approaches to portfolio development, metrics, and author/editor training and tools, earning multiple awards for innovation.